BONGINO: We Discovered An Entire Room With Hidden Evidence From James Comey!

Earlier today, I posted the full video of Dan Bongino’s appearance on Fox & Friends. I’ll drop it again below in case you missed it — but first, I need to call out one of the strangest moments in the entire interview. And trust me, there were a lot to choose from.

There’s a clip where Dan claims an entire room of “hidden evidence” was discovered — material that came from Comey’s FBI but was never scanned or processed like it should’ve been. It was essentially stashed away and forgotten (or deliberately ignored).

Before I share my thoughts, watch this part first:

Now, here’s what’s bugging me…

The whole thing is bizarre. I’m not saying I don’t believe Dan — I do — but I’m struggling to wrap my head around the how and why of this.

We already know Comey’s not exactly a straight shooter. So the idea that he or his people would hide evidence isn’t hard to believe. But why do it halfway? If your goal is to cover something up, why not just destroy it? Shred it, delete it, wipe it — whatever. Why just stash it in a room and leave it?

Why go through the trouble of hiding it, but not finish the job?

Was it laziness? Sloppiness? Or was there some line even Comey wouldn’t cross? Like maybe he thought, “If I don’t scan it, I can just claim it was an oversight — plausible deniability — but if I destroy it, that’s too far.”

Is that how he operates? Always just barely within the lines, always giving himself some thin excuse to fall back on? The same strategy he used with the “beach shells” situation?

“Oh, I didn’t know what ‘86 47’ meant! I thought it was just some code or political thing. Totally innocent…”

This seems to be his MO: Always leave just enough wiggle room to pretend ignorance, no matter how flimsy it looks.

I’m really starting to see a pattern here.

What do you think?

Here’s the full interview if you want to see it all in context:

WATCH: Dan Bongino’s Full Interview on Fox & Friends
This morning, Bongino dropped some major claims — including that there’s actual video of Jeffrey Epstein the night he died. That’s right. He says there is video.

But the clip gets weird fast. Dan says, “There is video,” and Lawrence Jones immediately jumps in, asking, “There’s video of him killing himself?” And Dan quickly replies, “No, no, not of that.”

It’s honestly hard to watch without feeling like you’re in a dark comedy skit.

Watch it here:

And here’s another thing I’ve got to point out…

I already know what the defenders are going to say — people like my buddy Shawn Farash will claim, “Dan’s just reading what’s in the file!”

And that’s fair to a point.

If Dan was simply laying out what the file says — without emotion, without judgment — that would be one thing. But that’s not what happened.

He didn’t just report it. He went on Maria Bartiromo’s show and passionately declared, “HE KILLED HIMSELF!” with total certainty.

That’s what’s raising eyebrows. That’s the shift.

2023 Dan Bongino would have picked this apart like Salt Bae slicing up steak for Piers Morgan. He’d be raising hell about missing video footage, the cameras “randomly” going out, the guards “falling asleep” — all of it.

But 2025 Dan Bongino — or should we say “FBI Dan” — now insists we trust the file, the video (which doesn’t actually show the death), and the people who compiled it.

That’s where a lot of us are tapping the brakes.

It’s not that we don’t appreciate Dan. We do. But when someone who used to question everything suddenly accepts something this fishy without hesitation — that’s when it’s fair to ask: what changed?

Let me know what you think.