VERY STRANGE: ‘Hit List’ of Minnesota Ass*ss*n Released, But Something’s Not Right

Things just got a whole lot stranger in the case of Minnesota’s alleged political assassin, Vance Boulter.

After Boulter was arrested for the brutal shootings of two Democrat state lawmakers and their spouses — which left Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband dead, and Sen. John Hoffman and his wife critically injured — police have now released what they claim is his “hit list.”

But here’s where it starts to feel off.

First, we haven’t been shown the original list — only a typed-up version that was reportedly handed over to authorities. Supposedly for “security reasons,” though that hasn’t stopped authorities in other cases from releasing originals.

The list includes over 60 Democrat politicians and a number of abortion clinics.

Alpha News reporter Liz Collin shared the contents on X, but immediately red flags popped up:

Why wasn’t Sen. John Hoffman’s name on the list at all, even though he was one of the actual shooting victims? That’s a glaring omission.

Then there’s the fact that former Sen. Kari Dziedzic was listed — even though she passed away from cancer back in December. Why would an assassin target someone who’s already been dead for six months?

It gets weirder.

Mike Freeman, the former Hennepin County Attorney, is also on the list… despite having been out of office for two years.

And reportedly, the list includes outdated legislative whip counts — meaning it reflects an old session of the Minnesota legislature, not the current one.

So we’re supposed to believe this was a recent and active “hit list,” yet it’s filled with outdated and irrelevant information?

Also, who in their right mind titles their assassination plan with the literal words: “Hit List”? That almost feels cartoonish — or like something added after the fact.

And again: why can’t we see the original document?

These inconsistencies have many people asking the obvious question — is this even a hit list at all? Or was it a political contact list that’s now being rebranded for narrative purposes?

Or worse… was it fabricated altogether?

Something doesn’t add up. And unless more transparency comes fast, the mystery around this case is only going to deepen.